Six states have ended in-state tuition for undocumented students since 2025

The finding: 20 of the 52 US jurisdictions — 19 states plus the District of Columbia — charge undocumented students the in-state tuition rate, and 18 of those also open state financial aid to them. But the direction of travel has reversed. Between June 2025 and August 2026, six jurisdictions ended access, and only one of the six was a legislature’s decision:

Jurisdictions that offered in-state tuition to undocumented students and lost it.
StateDateHowWhat happened
Texas2025-06-04Court orderThe Texas Dream Act (2001) was voided by a DOJ consent judgment
Florida2025-07-01State statuteSB 2-C repealed the 2014 out-of-state fee waiver; effective July 1, 2025
Oklahoma2025-08-29Court orderHB 1804 access ended by federal court order after a DOJ lawsuit; lawful presence now required
Kentucky2026-03-31Court orderThe 2015 in-state tuition regulation was rescinded by a DOJ consent judgment; an appeal is pending at the 6th Circuit
Nebraska2026-06-03Court orderLB 239 (2006) struck down as preempted by 8 U.S.C. 1623 (U.S. District Court, D. Neb.)
Illinois2026-07-24Court orderPublic Act 093-0007 (2003) ruled unconstitutional (S.D. Ill.); RISE Act aid and the DREAM Fund blocked too; the state did not appeal and the order took effect in August 2026

52 jurisdictions (50 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico). Researched per state on 2026-06-10 against state statutes and the Higher Ed Immigration Portal; counts recomputed 2026-09-09. This area is volatile — confirm with the admissions office before paying tuition. Primary source

Five of the six went through the courts, not the statehouse. Florida’s repeal was legislative — SB 2-C, ending the fee waiver about 6,500 students were using. The other five were Justice Department suits arguing that in-state tuition for undocumented students is preempted by 8 U.S.C. § 1623, and in each case the state’s policy was voided, rescinded, or struck down. Kentucky’s is on appeal at the Sixth Circuit; Nebraska’s law had stood for twenty years; Illinois’s — struck July 24, 2026, with the state declining to appeal — had stood for twenty-three, and the same ruling blocked RISE Act financial aid and the Illinois DREAM Fund.

Not every challenge has succeeded. Minnesota won dismissal in March 2026 and its Dream Act remains fully in effect, though the Justice Department appealed to the Eighth Circuit. Suits are now pending against eleven more states — California, Virginia (order awaited after a July 7, 2026 hearing), New Jersey, Kansas (where the state’s own attorney general joined a proposed consent decree to end access), Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maryland, Colorado, and, since summer 2026, New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. Those laws remain in effect while the cases proceed.

Every jurisdiction, by what it actually offers

In-state tuition statewide (0)

JurisdictionState aidLegal basis
ArizonaYesProposition 308 (2022) — in-state tuition after 2+ years at an Arizona high school and in-state graduation, regardless of status source
CaliforniaYesAB 540 (2001, expanded by SB 68) — in-state tuition after 3+ years at California schools DOJ sued California in November 2025; the laws remain fully in effect while the case is pending source
ColoradoYesASSET law (2013, updated 2022) — in-state tuition after 1 year at a Colorado high school plus 12 months residency DOJ sued Colorado on July 23, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
ConnecticutYesHB 6844 (2015) — in-state tuition after 2+ years at a Connecticut high school with in-state graduation DOJ sued Connecticut on August 10, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
District of ColumbiaYesAct 21-650 (2017) — resident tuition at UDC after 3 years at a DC high school source
HawaiiYesUH Regents Policy 6.209 — resident tuition after 12 months residency and 3 years at a US high school source
KansasNoKSA 76-731a (2004) — in-state tuition with Kansas high school attendance plus affidavit DOJ sued Kansas on June 24, 2026 and the state AG joined a proposed consent decree to end access the same day; the governor and student groups moved to intervene — the law still operates while the court decides source
MarylandYesMaryland Dream Act (2011, expanded 2019) — in-state tuition statewide DOJ sued Maryland on July 16, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
MassachusettsYesTuition Equity Law (2023) — in-state tuition for Massachusetts high school completers DOJ sued Massachusetts on June 29, 2026 (the state's response is due September 8, 2026) — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
MinnesotaYesMinnesota Dream Act (2013) — in-state tuition statewide Minnesota WON the DOJ lawsuit in March 2026 (dismissed); DOJ appealed to the Eighth Circuit in May 2026 — policies fully in effect source
NevadaYesSB 347 (2021) — in-state tuition for Nevada high school graduates regardless of status source
New JerseyYesTuition Equality Act (2013) — in-state tuition statewide DOJ sued New Jersey in April 2026; both laws remain in effect while the case is pending source
New MexicoYesSB 582 (2005) — in-state tuition after 1 year at and graduation from a New Mexico high school source
New YorkYes2002 law — in-state tuition for NY high school graduates (apply within 5 years, affidavit) DOJ sued New York on August 10, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
OregonYesTuition equity law (2013); expanded to asylum seekers in 2025 source
Rhode IslandYes2011 Board policy, codified by the RI Student Success Act (2021) — in-state tuition regardless of status DOJ sued Rhode Island on June 29, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
UtahLimitedHB 144 (2002) — in-state tuition after 3 years at a Utah high school plus affidavit; 2026 repeal attempts failed source
VermontYesS.191 (2024) — in-state tuition for all Vermont residents regardless of immigration status DOJ sued Vermont on August 10, 2026 — the law remains in effect while the case proceeds source
VirginiaYesHB 1547 (2020) — in-state tuition after 2 years at a Virginia high school plus Virginia tax filings DOJ sued in December 2025 and Virginia now defends the law; a hearing was held July 7, 2026 and the court's order is awaited — the law remains in effect source
WashingtonYesHB 1079 (2003) — in-state tuition after Washington high school completion and 3 years residency source

Limited — some campuses, or DACA recipients only (0)

JurisdictionState aidLegal basis
ArkansasNoHB 1684 (2019) — in-state tuition for DACA recipients only (3+ years residency + in-state graduation); non-DACA undocumented excluded source
DelawareLimitedNo statewide law; University of Delaware and Delaware Tech extend in-state rates by institutional policy source
IdahoNoLawful presence required (SB 1280, 2016); some campuses grant DACA recipients in-state rates; non-DACA undocumented excluded source
IowaNoNo statewide law; some campuses (e.g., North Iowa Area CC) extend in-state rates; Regents guidelines may cover DACA source
MaineNoNo statewide law; University of Maine System policy can extend in-state rates to DACA and TPS holders source
MichiganNoNo statewide law; campus-by-campus tuition equity (e.g., University of Michigan, Eastern Michigan) source
OhioNoStatute bars undocumented students, but a 2013 ruling grants DACA recipients in-state tuition with residency source
TexasLimitedThe Texas Dream Act (2001) was VOIDED on June 4, 2025 by a DOJ consent judgment; per state filings only DACA recipients retain in-state eligibility, and campuses apply the order inconsistently Rulemaking is still in flux — confirm directly with your college's registrar before paying tuition source

No policy — nonresident rates apply (0)

JurisdictionState aidLegal basis
AlaskaNoNo state policy; undocumented and DACA students pay nonresident rates source
FloridaNoSB 2-C (February 2025) REPEALED the 2014 out-of-state fee waiver — undocumented students pay out-of-state rates since July 1, 2025 About 6,500 students lost the waiver in 2025 source
IllinoisNoPublic Act 093-0007 (2003) was ruled unconstitutional on July 24, 2026 — a federal court (S.D. Ill., USA v. Illinois, 3:25-cv-01691) blocked the in-state tuition law; the court delayed its order 14 days and the state did not appeal, so nonresident rates apply from August 2026 source
KentuckyNoThe 2015 in-state tuition regulation was RESCINDED by a DOJ consent judgment on March 31, 2026; an appeal is pending at the 6th Circuit source
LouisianaNoNo state policy; Act 419 (2025) requires agencies to report the immigration status of people receiving state services source
MississippiNoNo policy on in-state tuition for undocumented students; no enrollment ban either source
MontanaNoNo state policy; Regents residency policy does not clearly cover undocumented students source
NebraskaNoLB 239 (2006) was struck down on June 3, 2026 — a federal court (U.S. District Court, D. Neb.) ruled it preempted by federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1623); in-state tuition for undocumented students ended immediately source
North DakotaNoNo state policy; legal residency required for resident rates source
OklahomaNoHB 1804 access ENDED by federal court order on August 29, 2025 after a DOJ lawsuit — lawful presence now required source
PennsylvaniaNoNo statewide policy; Penn State ended its earlier practice of extending in-state rates source
Puerto RicoNoNo territory-wide policy; the University of Puerto Rico applies its own residency rules source
South DakotaNoNo state law or Regents policy extends in-state tuition source
TennesseeNo2012 law requires lawful presence for in-state rates; DACA recipients excluded source
West VirginiaNoNo law or policy extends in-state tuition (refugee/asylee residency exception only) source
WisconsinNoThe 2009 in-state tuition access was repealed in 2011; nonresident rates apply source
WyomingNoNo known state policy; nonresident rates apply by default source

Banned by law — in-state rates or enrollment barred (0)

JurisdictionState aidLegal basis
AlabamaNoHB 56 (2011) bars undocumented students from enrolling in public colleges; some campuses admit DACA recipients source
GeorgiaNoSB 492 (2008) requires out-of-state tuition; Regents Policy 4.1.6 bars enrollment at selective campuses (UGA, Georgia Tech) source
IndianaNoHB 1402 (2011) bars in-state tuition for students not lawfully present; 2025-26 bills to change it failed source
MissouriNoAnnual budget rider (since 2015) bars rates below international-student tuition for undocumented students, including DACA source
New HampshireNoHB 1383 (2012) requires a legal-status affidavit, barring undocumented students including DACA from in-state tuition source
North CarolinaNoUNC System policy (2004) requires out-of-state tuition for undocumented students including DACA; a 2025 equity bill was not enacted source
South CarolinaNo2008 law BARS undocumented students from enrolling at public colleges entirely; DACA recipients may enroll at out-of-state rates source

52 jurisdictions (50 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico). Researched per state on 2026-06-10 against state statutes and the Higher Ed Immigration Portal; counts recomputed 2026-09-09. This area is volatile — confirm with the admissions office before paying tuition. Primary source

What the data shows

  • Access is not a majority position. 20 jurisdictions offer in-state tuition, 8 offer it on a limited basis, and 24 do not — 7 of those because a state law specifically bars in-state rates or, in three states, enrollment itself.
  • Tuition and aid are separate questions. 18 jurisdictions pair in-state tuition with state financial aid; the rest of the in-state group offers the price but not the money. A student can be charged the resident rate and still have no state grant available.
  • “Limited” hides two different situations. Some states extend in-state rates only at particular campuses by institutional policy rather than statute; others restrict eligibility to DACA recipients, which excludes undocumented students without DACA. Both land in the same column and mean very different things to an applicant.
  • The mechanism is now judicial. Of the six reversals, five came from federal court orders or DOJ consent judgments. That is a faster clock than legislation, and it is why a state’s status can change between an application and a tuition bill.

What this means in practice

If your state is in the in-state group, the rate applies through the state’s own rule — check what documentation it requires, since most conditioning statutes ask for years of in-state high school attendance and an affidavit rather than immigration status. Our state-by-state guide has the per-state detail, including which private scholarship funds accept applicants regardless of status.

If your state is one of the six that ended access, the practical question is what applies to you now rather than what the old rule said. In Texas the state’s filings say DACA recipients retain eligibility while campuses apply the order inconsistently, so the registrar’s office — not a website — is the authority on what you will be billed. In Illinois the July 2026 order also cut off MAP grants and the DREAM Fund, so the aid question and the tuition question changed together. Everywhere else in that group, nonresident rates now apply.

This is information about how programs work, not advice about your situation. Confirm with the admissions or bursar’s office before you rely on a rate, and see Know Your Rights for what schools may and may not ask.

Method and caveat

Each jurisdiction was researched against the Higher Ed Immigration Portal’s state page and the Presidents’ Alliance litigation tracker, with the controlling statute or court order named in the row; the stored source URL is the portal or tracker page rather than the primary statute itself. Four distinctions keep the counts honest. First, the unit is the jurisdiction, not the state — 50 states plus D.C. and Puerto Rico, which is why the total is 52 and why “20” means 19 states and D.C. Second, “limited” is a real category, not a hedge: it covers both campus-by-campus institutional policies and DACA-only eligibility, and collapsing it into either “yes” or “no” would misstate what a student faces. Third, the counts are computed from the rows on every site build, so the totals here and the table above cannot drift apart. Fourth, this is the most volatile dataset we publish — a single ruling moves a state, five did so in the last fourteen months, and the research date on each row is the honest limit of what we can promise.

Download the data: tuition_equity_states.json — all 52 jurisdictions with tuition status, state-aid status, the controlling law, and the source URL, plus the computed national counts and the reversal series.

Embed this widget on your site — free

A college access program, a high school counseling office, a legal-aid org, a newsroom: drop in the current count and the reversal list. When a court moves a state, we update the data and your copy moves with it:

<iframe src="https://migrantusa.com/embed/tuition-equity/" width="100%" height="520"
        style="border:1px solid #e2e8e4;border-radius:8px;max-width:640px"
        title="In-state tuition access for undocumented students, by state" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:.85rem">In-state tuition access by state — data by
  <a href="https://migrantusa.com/datasets/in-state-tuition-access/">MigrantUSA</a></p>

Please keep the credit line — a link back to this page is the only thing we ask in return.

Suggested citation: MigrantUSA, “In-state tuition and state financial aid access for undocumented students, by jurisdiction,” migrantusa.com/datasets/in-state-tuition-access/, retrieved [date].